The first step in developing a Process Improvement Performance Management (PIPM) system is to determine what information related to process improvement states (or other payers) and providers will collect.
The STAR-SI initiative and other NIATx projects provided lessons on what information must be collected. States often did not collect the date of first contact. State (and other payer) systems may also fail to adequately capture other key process improvement variables.
Conduct a data walk-through to make sure you are collecting the right data, following the steps outlined below:
Create a brief synopsis of the lessons learned from the data walk-through. What seems to work well? What are potential areas for improvement?
Use the PIDC to determine what key process improvement measures are missing from your system. If date of first contact is missing, as it is in many states, consider modifying existing forms or expanding existing data capabilities to capture this variable. For example:
When implementing changes to the reporting system for providers, states can support the process by:
However, some states did not have an existing system to capture any of the key process improvement variables. These states used the NIATx spreadsheet to create an online reporting system for process improvement performance measurement in their states. The state of New York had to create a PIPM system to support its ongoing quality efforts. Read the New York story to learn more.
Oregon is another state that built their system for the NIATx 200 project using the NIATx worksheet as the foundation of their system. State staff in Oregon also discussed the design process with staff from New York in order to leverage their ideas in the design of the Oregon system. The Oregon system is available through a secure login at their website. The site contains a link to frequently asked questions . The state also prepared four additional documents to help providers navigate the system: